Binance vs Uniswap v3 (Ethereum)
Side-by-side comparison of CEX and CEX — fees, trading volume, liquidity and traffic.
| Metric | Binance | Uniswap v3 (Ethereum) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | CEX | CEX |
| Global rank(Lower is better) | #2 | #121 |
| 24h volume | $44.20B | $300.03M |
| 7d volume | $1181.57B | $1.92B |
| 30d volume | $2070.84B | $9.31B |
| 24h volume change | -25.07% | -14.95% |
| Maker fee(Lower is better) | 2.000% | — |
| Taker fee(Lower is better) | 4.000% | — |
| Market pairs | 2,065 | 948 |
| Coins listed | 636 | 574 |
| Weekly visits | 8.36M | 296.6K |
| Liquidity score | 970.00 | 293520511.55 |
| Exchange score | — | — |
Green values indicate the better metric for traders (higher volume, lower fees, etc.). Data is aggregated from multiple sources and refreshed regularly.
About this comparison
Choosing between Binance and Uniswap v3 (Ethereum) depends on what you trade and how often. Binance is a centralized exchange with $44.20B in 24-hour volume across 2,065 pairs, while Uniswap v3 (Ethereum) is a centralized exchange with $300.03M in 24-hour volume across 948 pairs. For high-volume traders, lower taker fees and deeper liquidity matter most; for casual users, the number of supported coins and ease of access often outweigh raw volume metrics.